Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 11 results ...
Attarzadeh, M, Chua, D K H, Beer, M and Abbott, E L S (2017) Options-based negotiation management of PPP-BOT infrastructure projects. Construction Management and Economics, 35(11-12), 676-92.
Bildsten, L and Manley, K (2015) A framework for understanding purchasing in building construction companies. Construction Management and Economics, 33(11-12), 865-79.
Chand, A M and Loosemore, M (2015) A socio-ecological analysis of hospital resilience to extreme weather events. Construction Management and Economics, 33(11-12), 907-20.
Hinton, M A and Hamilton, R T (2015) Competitive tendering and individual behaviour in the construction industry: Convenient immorality at work. Construction Management and Economics, 33(11-12), 880-9.
Hu, X and Liu, C (2017) SLACKS-based data envelopment analysis for eco-efficiency assessment in the Australian construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 35(11-12), 693-706.
Kaminsky, J (2015) Institutionalizing infrastructure: Photo-elicitation of cultural-cognitive knowledge of development. Construction Management and Economics, 33(11-12), 942-56.
Krystallis, I, Demian, P and Price, A D F (2015) Using BIM to integrate and achieve holistic future-proofing objectives in healthcare projects. Construction Management and Economics, 33(11-12), 890-906.
Rajeh, M A, Tookey, J E and Rotimi, J O B (2015) Developing a procurement path determination chart SEM-based approach. Construction Management and Economics, 33(11-12), 921-41.
Sage, D (2017) Thinking with materialities in construction management: A response to Alexander Styhre. Construction Management and Economics, 35(11-12), 657-62.
Stewart, I, Fenn, P and Aminian, E (2017) Human research ethics: is construction management research concerned?. Construction Management and Economics, 35(11-12), 665-75.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: ethics; ethics approval, informed consent; construction management research; morality; researchers; informed consent; research; construction management; building components
- ISBN/ISSN: 0144-6193
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2017.1315151
- Abstract:
Construction Management Research (CMR) depends upon human beings participating in research, the quality of treatment of participants having direct effect on the quality of their participation, in turn that of the research itself, making treatment of humans and the ethical dilemmas that can ensue an important area of competence for CM (Construction Management) researchers. Does the growing field of CMR demonstrate appropriate concern for human research ethics? Evidence of typical CMR research is taken from the online Cooperative Network for Building Researchers (CNBR), particularly a search for "informed consent" collateral. It was found that there was little concern with human research ethics, which we argue is also evident in the lack of research on this matter in CMR-related literature, or any reference to these matters in the relevant professional and institutional bodies. Reasons as to why this might be are proposed. The consequences of the apparent level of concern are that participants can be exposed to "wrongs", despite pressures for compliance from institutional ethics boards. However, the discipline of critically evaluating human research approach through a framework of ethical considerations is not only morally correct, at least according to the morality that is concerned for consequences to participants, but is also objectively useful to researchers, improving the reliability and validity of their research and lowering barriers to participation.;Construction Management Research (CMR) depends upon human beings participating in research, the quality of treatment of participants having direct effect on the quality of their participation, in turn that of the research itself, making treatment of humans and the ethical dilemmas that can ensue an important area of competence for CM (Construction Management) researchers. Does the growing field of CMR demonstrate appropriate concern for human research ethics? Evidence of typical CMR research is taken from the online Cooperative Network for Building Researchers (CNBR), particularly a search for "informed consent" collateral. It was found that there was little concern with human research ethics, which we argue is also evident in the lack of research on this matter in CMR-related literature, or any reference to these matters in the relevant professional and institutional bodies. Reasons as to why this might be are proposed. The consequences of the apparent level of concern are that participants can be exposed to "wrongs", despite pressures for compliance from institutional ethics boards. However, the discipline of critically evaluating human research approach through a framework of ethical considerations is not only morally correct, at least according to the morality that is concerned for consequences to participants, but is also objectively useful to researchers, improving the reliability and validity of their research and lowering barriers to participation.;
Turner, M, Scott-Young, C M and Holdsworth, S (2017) Promoting wellbeing at university: The role of resilience for students of the built environment. Construction Management and Economics, 35(11-12), 707-18.