Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 16 results ...
Abdullahi Ahmed, U, Noor Amila Wan Abdullah, Z and Abdul-Rashid, A-A (2021) Malaysian regulators' ranking of PPP contract governance skills. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(1), 88-102.
Almarri, K and Boussabaine, H (2021) Re-evaluating the risk costing agenda in PPP projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(1), 22-37.
Chileshe, N and Kavishe, N (2021) Readiness assessment of public-private partnerships adoption in developing countries: the case of Tanzania. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(1), 71-87.
Conejos, S, Ubando, A and Lin Chew, M Y (2022) Design for maintainability tool for nano-façade coating applications on high-rise façades in the tropics. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(1), 70-95.
Darlow, G, Rotimi, J O B and Wajiha Mohsin, S (2022) Automation in New Zealand's offsite construction: a status update. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(1), 38-52.
Dolla, T, Devkar, G and Boeing, L (2021) Procurement governance and information asymmetry in waste management of India. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(1), 38-51.
Jelodar, M B, Wilkinson, S, Kalatehjari, R and Zou, Y (2022) Designing for construction procurement: an integrated Decision Support System for Building Information Modelling. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(1), 111-27.
Khatibi, H, Wilkinson, S, Heiman, D, Baghersad, M, Ghaedi, K and Javanmardi, A (2022) Indicators bank for smart and resilient cities: design of excellence. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(1), 5-19.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: smart cities; urban areas; disaster recovery; infrastructure; resilience; sustainable development; specifications
- ISBN/ISSN:
- URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-07-2020-0122
- Abstract:
The study aims to use DfX to develop a comprehensive database of smart and resilient indicators that assists city administrators and authorities alike. The Smart and Resilient Cities Indicators Bank (SRCIB) will identify the level of smart and resilience determinants that will simultaneously provide ways to improve the city's infrastructure to meet smart and resilient objectives. Design of excellence (DfX) is adopted in dissecting from four best indicators of established systems, and a database of indicators is developed and specified in diverse ways. A new indicator system is then created for smart and resilient cities. The proposed indicator bank consists of four layers consisting of dimension, sub-dimension, key issues and the number of indicators resulting from four different indicator systems that the study have analysed. The proposed indicator bank is an exploratory approach that needs to be tested in a real scenario because the urban systems are complex inter-related systems with too many variables that may influence actual outcomes. Thus, the proposed indicators bank does not attempt to quantify or solve related urban issues commonly address in smart and resilient city concepts but more to enhance the management of attaining towards smart and resilient specifications. The proposed indicator bank is an exploratory approach that needs to be tested in a real scenario because the urban systems are complex inter-related systems with too many variables that may influence actual outcomes. Thus, the proposed indicators bank does not attempt to quantify or solve related urban issues commonly address smart and resilient city concepts but more to enhance the management of attaining smart and resilient specifications. The study builds a robust guide for assessing smart and resilient cities that is yet a widely accessible assessment framework. The proposed SRCIB allows local authorities and relevant stakeholders of typical cities to better manage its urban agenda towards smart and resilient city objectives when specific indicators are defined. Besides, a smart city can become resilient; likewise, a resilient city can become smart as the SRCIB is comprehensive.
Liu, T, Mostafa, S, Sherif, M and Tuan Son, N (2021) Emerging themes of public-private partnership application in developing smart city projects: a conceptual framework. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(1), 138-56.
Luane Assunção Paiva, M, Clara Beatriz Ferreira de, O and Reymard Savio Sampaio de, M (2022) Allocating scarce financial resources effectively through function analysis in social housing projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(1), 96-110.
Mangu, S, Thillai Rajan, A and Deep, A (2021) Comparison of toll and annuity PPPs: a case study of highway projects in India. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(1), 103-20.
Marinelli, M (2022) A DfX-based approach for incorporating sustainability in infrastructure project planning. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(1), 20-37.
Nguyen, N, Almarri, K and Boussabaine, H (2021) A risk-adjusted decoupled-net-present-value model to determine the optimal concession period of BOT projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(1), 4-21.
Nimesha Sahani, J, Chan, D W M and Kumaraswamy, M (2021) A systematic literature review and analysis towards developing PPP models for delivering smart infrastructure. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(1), 121-37.
Raviv, G, Shapira, A and Sacks, R (2022) Empirical investigation of the applicability of constructability methods to prevent design errors. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(1), 53-69.
Sarvari, H, Chan, D W M, Banaitiene, N, Norhazilan Md, N and Beer, M (2021) Barriers to development of private sector investment in water and sewage industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(1), 52-70.