ARCOM

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 33 results ...

Aghimien, D O, Aghimien, E I, Fadiyimu, A O and Adegbembo, T F (2018) Survival strategies of built environment organisations in a challenging economy. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(07), 861–76.

Aghimien, D O, Oke, A E and Aigbavboa, C O (2018) Barriers to the adoption of value management in developing countries. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(07), 818–34.

Bao, F, Chen, C, Chan, A P, Martek, I and Shrestha, A (2019) Dynamic framework transfer model for public–private partnerships. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1218–39.

Chen, C, Tang, L, Hancock, C M and Zhang, P (2019) Development of low-cost mobile laser scanning for 3D construction indoor mapping by using inertial measurement unit, ultra-wide band and 2D laser scanner. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1367–86.

Chen, K and Lu, W (2019) Bridging BIM and building (BBB) for information management in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1518–32.

Chia, F C, Skitmore, M, Gray, J and Bridge, A (2018) International comparisons of nominal and real construction labour productivity. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(07), 896–915.

Cui, Z, Liu, J, Xia, B and Cheng, Y (2019) Beyond national culture difference. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1476–97.

Dang, C N and Le-Hoai, L (2018) Revisiting storey enclosure method for early estimation of structural building construction cost. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(07), 877–95.

Goel, A, Ganesh, L and Kaur, A (2020) Social sustainability considerations in construction project feasibility study: a stakeholder salience perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(07), 1429–59.

Hasan, A, Baroudi, B, Elmualim, A and Rameezdeen, R (2018) Factors affecting construction productivity: a 30 year systematic review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(07), 916–37.

Karami, H and Olatunji, O A (2020) Critical overrun causations in marine projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(07), 1579–94.

Khattak, M S and Mustafa, U (2019) Management competencies, complexities and performance in engineering infrastructure projects of Pakistan. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1321–47.

Leung, M, Famakin, I O and Wang, C (2019) Developing an integrated indoor built environment–quality of life model for the elderly in public and subsidized housing. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1498–517.

Lew, Y, Hassim, S, Muniandy, R and Hua, L T (2018) Structural equation modelling for subcontracting practice: Malaysia chapter. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(07), 835–60.

Li, G, Chen, C, Zhang, G and Martek, I (2019) Bid/no-bid decision factors for Chinese international contractors in international construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(07), 1619–43.

Liu, N, Ruan, L, Jin, R, Chen, Y, Deng, X and Yang, T (2019) Investigation of individual perceptions towards BIM implementation-a Chongqing case study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1455–75.

Moussavi Nadoushani, Z S, Akbarnezhad, A and Rey, D (2018) Optimization of concrete placing operation based on competing carbon footprint, cost and production rate objectives. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(07), 938–57.

Nasirzadeh, F, Carmichael, D G, Jarban, M J and Rostamnezhad, M (2019) Hybrid fuzzy-system dynamics approach for quantification of the impacts of construction claims. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1261–76.

Oechler, E, Molenaar, K R, Hallowell, M and Scott, S (2018) State-of-practice for risk-based quality assurance in state departments of transportation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(07), 958–70.

Olatunji, O A (2019) Promoting student commitment to BIM in construction education. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1240–60.

Pablo, Z and London, K A (2020) Stable relationality and dynamic innovation: two models of collaboration in SME-driven offsite manufacturing supply chains in housing construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(07), 1553–77.

Rostamnezhad, M, Nasirzadeh, F, Khanzadi, M, Jarban, M J and Ghayoumian, M (2020) Modeling social sustainability in construction projects by integrating system dynamics and fuzzy‐DEMATEL method: a case study of highway project. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(07), 1595–618.

Salama, T and Moselhi, O (2019) Multi-objective optimization for repetitive scheduling under uncertainty. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1294–320.

Sun, H, Wang, Y and Meng, J (2019) A trading and pricing method of expansion options for BOT freeway projects in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1406–23.

Tayeh, B A, Hallaq, K A, Zahoor, H and Al Faqawi, A H (2019) Techniques and benefits of implementing the last planner system in the Gaza Strip construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1424–36.

Uusitalo, P, Seppänen, O, Peltokorpi, A and Olivieri, H (2019) Solving design management problems using lean design management: the role of trust. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1387–405.

Wang, G, Xia, C and Cao, D (2020) State and determinants of inter-regional market entry practices in the Chinese construction industry: evidence from national quality award projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(07), 1461–77.

Wang, Y and Jin, X (2019) Determine the optimal capital structure of BOT projects using interval numbers with Tianjin Binhai New District Metro Z4 line in China as an example. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1348–66.

Xue, J, Shen, G Q, Yang, R J, Zafar, I, Ekanayake, E, Lin, X and Darko, A (2020) Influence of formal and informal stakeholder relationship on megaproject performance: a case of China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(07), 1505–31.

Yap, J B H, Leong, W J and Skitmore, M (2020) Capitalising teamwork for enhancing project delivery and management in construction: empirical study in Malaysia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(07), 1479–503.

• Type: Journal Article
• Keywords: Construction; Teamwork; Team effectiveness; Dimensions; Temporary project team; Project management;
• ISBN/ISSN: 0969-9988
• URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2019-0581
• Abstract:
  Teamwork in the construction industry has attracted much attention from both academic and industrial circles. Most importantly, improving team effectiveness will increase the likelihood of successful project delivery. Recognising the factors influencing team dynamics is important for enhanced team performance. Based on a detailed literature review, a survey questionnaire containing 10 aspects and 25 attributes of teamwork relevant to construction is used to collect feedback from Malaysian construction practitioners from client, consultant and contractor organisations to prioritise these hypothesised variables. The data are then subjected to reliability analysis, descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, and frequencies), a one-sample t-test, the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA and exploratory factor analysis. The significance of these aspects and attributes is then presented. The three most crucial aspects are “project performance”, “decision-making capability” and “problem-solving ability”. The most influential attributes are “effective communication between project team members”, “efficient team leadership”, “well-defined team responsibilities and roles”, “clear team goals and objectives” and “good collaboration between all project leaders”. The Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA reveals five attributes having statistically significant differences with respect to company size, namely “clear team goals and objectives”, “commitment to the project”, “adequate resources”, “team or task processes” and “creativity and innovation”. Six underlying dimensions are found, comprising (1) participative engagement and task commitment; (2) team responsibility structure and accountability; (3) culture of trust and respect; (4) leader's skills and abilities; (5) top management support; and (6) synergic working environment. The identification of these dimensions for team effectiveness provides rigorous basis for formulating useful team-building strategies for integrating a collaborative environment among project stakeholders and consequently improving project performance. This paper bridges the identified knowledge gap concerning the dimensionality of teamwork attributes in construction-based setting and adds to existing knowledge of how team effectiveness can be leveraged to improve project performance in the construction management literature.

Yu, J, Ma, G and Cai, S (2019) Disparities in the provision of aging-friendly communities in old and new urban neighborhoods in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1277–93.

Yuan, F, Tang, M and Hong, J (2020) Efficiency estimation and reduction potential of the Chinese construction industry via SE-DEA and artificial neural network. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(07), 1533–52.

Zhang, J, Xie, H and Li, H (2019) Improvement of students problem-solving skills through project execution planning in civil engineering and construction management education. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(07), 1437–54.