ARCOM

Abstracts – Browse Results

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 35 results ...

Adekunle, T O (2019) Field measurements of comfort, seasonal performance and cold stress in cross-laminated timber (CLT) school buildings. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 655–73.

Aggarwal, A, Rani, A and Kumar, M (2019) A robust method to authenticate car license plates using segmentation and ROI based approach. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 737–47.

Aggarwal, T and Solomon, P (2019) Quantitative analysis of the development of smart cities in India. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 711–26.

Agyekum, K, Adinyira, E and Ampratwum, G (2020) Factors driving the adoption of green certification of buildings in Ghana. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 595–613.

de Laat, P (2019) Resource depletion: where is an intervention most effective?. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 8(04), 307–21.

Dell'Anna, F, Bottero, M, Becchio, C, Corgnati, S P and Mondini, G (2020) Designing a decision support system to evaluate the environmental and extra-economic performances of a nearly zero-energy building. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 413–42.

Dewan, S and Singh, L (2020) Use of blockchain in designing smart city. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 695–709.

du Toit, J and Wagner, C (2020) The effect of housing type on householders' self-reported participation in recycling. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 395–412.

Ekemode, B G (2019) Impact of urban regeneration on commercial property values in Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 557–71.

Eslamirad, N, Malekpour Kolbadinejad, S, Mahdavinejad, M and Mehranrad, M (2020) Thermal comfort prediction by applying supervised machine learning in green sidewalks of Tehran. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 361–74.

Ghosh, S, Kochhar, K, Sharma, A, Kaushal, S, Agrawal, J, Garg, A, Kumar, A and Dugar, Y (2016) Investigating structure generated turbulence using an unmanned aerial vehicle: A prelude to optimal ventilation strategies in India’s upcoming smart cities. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 5(04), 372-92.

Hopkins, E A (2016) Barriers to adoption of campus green building policies. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 5(04), 340-51.

Hussein, D (2020) A user preference modelling method for the assessment of visual complexity in building façade. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 483–501.

Khan, N A, Ullah Khan, S, Ahmed, S, Farooqi, I H, Hussain, A, Vambol, S and Vambol, V (2019) Smart ways of hospital wastewater management, regulatory standards and conventional treatment techniques. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 727–36.

Konstantinou, T, de Jonge, T, Oorschot, L, El Messlaki, S, van Oel, C and Asselbergs, T (2019) The relation of energy efficiency upgrades and cost of living, investigated in two cases of multi-residential buildings in the Netherlands. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 615–33.

Krueger, K, Stoker, A and Gaustad, G (2019) “Alternative” materials in the green building and construction sector. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 8(04), 270–91.

Type: Journal Article
Keywords: Sustainability; Policy; Embodied energy; Life-cycle assessment; Alternative materials; Green construction;
ISBN/ISSN: 2046-6099
URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-09-2018-0045
Abstract:
The construction, use and demolition of buildings carry enormous environmental burdens. As one step to reduce a building’s environmental impact, green building design guidelines and certification programs, such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, Cradle to Cradle and the Whole Building Design Guide, promote the specification of alternative, non-traditional building materials. Alternative materials carry a variety of potential benefits: reducing the amount of energy and other resources needed to create building materials; creating healthier indoor and outdoor environments; diverting or reducing waste from landfills; reducing the use of scarce, critical or economically volatile materials; and spurring innovation in the building industry. However, a lack of clarity surrounds alternative materials and creates a barrier to their usage. The purpose of this paper is to review definitions of alternative materials in various design guidelines in order to provide context to their specification and usage. Design/methodology/approach Through a survey of green building programs and guidelines, existing literature on alternative materials, and life-cycle assessment using multiple inventory databases, this study tackles the following questions: what constitutes an alternative building material; what are the current barriers to their specification; how are they specified in the most common design guidelines; and do alternative building materials present a “greener” alternative? Findings These results show that while often alternative materials do in fact show promise for reducing environmental impacts of the built environment, by how much can be a challenging question to quantify and depends on a variety of factors. While many green building guides and certification systems provide recommendations for use of alternative materials, the sheer diversity and uncertainty of these systems coupled with the complexity in understanding their impacts still present a significant barrier to their specification. Much work remains in a variety of disciplines to tackle these barriers. A clear emphasis should be on better understanding their environmental impacts, particularly with respect to the context within the built environment that their specification will provide energy, resource and emission savings. Other key areas of significant work include reducing costs, removing regulatory and code barriers, and educating designers, consumers, and end-users. Originality/value Alternative materials are defined and specified in a diversity of contexts leaving the design and construction communities hesitant to promote their use; other work has found this to be a key barrier to their widespread usage. By compiling definitions, barriers and design guidelines instructions while also exploring analytically the benefits of specific cases, this work provides a foundation for better understanding where new, more sustainable materials can be successfully specified.

Kumar, A, Jain, S and Yadav, D (2020) A novel simulation-annealing enabled ranking and scaling statistical simulation constrained optimization algorithm for Internet-of-things (IoTs). Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 675–93.

Kumar, V, Hundal, B S and Kaur, K (2019) Factors affecting consumer buying behaviour of solar water pumping system. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 8(04), 351–64.

Lau, J L and Hashim, A H (2019) Mediation analysis of the relationship between environmental concern and intention to adopt green concepts. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 539–56.

Lau, J L, Hashim, A H, Samah, A A and Salim, A S S (2016) Understanding the environmental worldviews of Malaysian project managers. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 5(04), 307-24.

Loyola, M (2019) A method for real-time error detection in low-cost environmental sensors data. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 8(04), 338–50.

Moshtaghian, F, Golabchi, M and Noorzai, E (2020) A framework to dynamic identification of project risks. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 375–93.

Ndlangamandla, M G and Combrinck, C (2019) Environmental sustainability of construction practices in informal settlements. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 523–38.

Opawole, A, Babatunde, S O, Kajimo-Shakantu, K and Ateji, O A (2020) Analysis of barriers to the application of life cycle costing in building projects in developing countries. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 503–21.

Opoku, D J, Ayarkwa, J and Agyekum, K (2019) Barriers to environmental sustainability of construction projects. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 8(04), 292–306.

Prakash, A (2019) Smart Cities Mission in India: some definitions and considerations. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 8(04), 322–37.

Rahman, F, Rowlands, I and Weber, O (2017) Do green buildings capture higher market valuations and lower vacancy rates? A Canadian case study of LEED and BOMA-BEST properties. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 6(04), 102-15.

Saadi, A and Belhadef, H (2020) Deep neural networks for Arabic information extraction. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 467–82.

Sahebzadeh, S, Dalvand, Z, Sadeghfar, M and Heidari, A (2018) Vernacular architecture of Iran’s hot regions; elements and strategies for a comfortable living environment. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 573–93.

Shooshtarian, S and Ridley, I (2016) Determination of acceptable thermal range in outdoor built environments by various methods. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 5(04), 352-71.

Susilo, A, Fitriah, F, Sunaryo, Ayu Rachmawati, E T and Suryo, E A (2020) Analysis of landslide area of Tulung subdistrict, Ponorogo, Indonesia in 2017 using resistivity method. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 341–60.

Tunji-Olayeni, P, Kajimo-Shakantu, K and Osunrayi, E (2020) Practitioners' experiences with the drivers and practices for implementing sustainable construction in Nigeria: a qualitative assessment. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 443–65.

van Stijn, A and Gruis, V (2020) Towards a circular built environment. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(04), 635–53.

Xia, B, Rosly, N, Wu, P, Bridge, A and Pienaar, J (2016) Improving sustainability literacy of future quantity surveyors. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 5(04), 325-39.

Abstracts database