Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 15 results ...

Abdullahi, B, Ibrahim, Y M, Ibrahim, A and Bala, K (2019) Development of e-tendering evaluation system for Nigerian public sector. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 122–49.

Acheamfour, V K, Kissi, E, Adjei-Kumi, T and Adinyira, E (2019) Review of empirical arguments on contractor pre-qualification criteria. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 70–83.

Adu, E T and Opawole, A (2019) Assessment of performance of teamwork in construction projects delivery in South-Southern Nigeria. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 230–50.

Dadzie, J, Runeson, G and Ding, G (2019) Assessing determinants of sustainable upgrade of existing buildings. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 270–92.

Hellas, M S, Chaib, R and Verzea, I (2019) Artificial intelligence treating the problem of uncertainty in quantitative risk analysis (QRA). Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 40–54.

Hulio, Z H and Jiang, W (2019) An assessment of effects of non-stationary operational conditions on wind turbine under different wind scenario. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 102–21.

Ibn Majdoub Hassani, Z, El Barkany, A, Jabri, A, El Abbassi, I and Darcherif, A M (2019) Hybrid approach for solving the integrated planning and scheduling production problem. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 172–89.

Luo, Z, Chen, Y, Cen, K, Pan, H, Zhong, M and He, J (2019) Research on comprehensive environmental impact assessment of shale gas development. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 1–20.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Comprehensive environmental impact assessment; Evaluation index system; Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IFAHP); Shale gas development;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 1726-0531
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-11-2018-0205
  • Abstract:
    In recent years, to solve the contradiction between energy supply and demand, the Chinese Government has vigorously promoted shale gas development. With the rapid development of the shale gas industry, the environmental impact problems have become increasingly serious. Therefore, it is of great significance to carry out a comprehensive environmental impact assessment of shale gas development. This study aims to provide a theoretical basis for enterprises to make development decisions on shale gas projects by constructing a model of comprehensive environmental impact assessment for shale gas development. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, the comprehensive environmental impact factors of shale gas development are analyzed from the two aspects of the natural environment and macro environment, and the index system of comprehensive environmental impact assessment for shale gas development including 7 secondary indicators and 24 tertiary indicators is constructed. Owing to the fact that qualitative indicators are difficult to quantify in the evaluation process, the method of intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IFAHP) is adopted for evaluation. This method (IFAHP) can delicately describe the hesitancy degree of the decision-makers in the process of assigning a weight to the indicators, and make the weight assignment of each index more accurate. Furthermore, this method overcomes the shortcomings of the conventional methods, such as the complexity of calculation and the large amount of calculation. Findings The evaluation model is applied to a shale gas platform drilling project in Southwest China. Based on the ratings from 13 experts, the comprehensive environmental impact assessment grade of this project is good, indicating that the shale gas development project is feasible. The result is basically in line with the actual situation. Originality/value Based on the consideration of the natural environmental impacts of shale gas development, this paper also has considered the macro environmental impact of shale gas development, and has established the index system of comprehensive environmental impact assessment for shale gas development from the two aspects of the natural environment and macro environment. To overcome such difficulties as incomplete evaluation by decision-makers, cumbersome calculation process and a large amount of calculation, this paper has adopted the method of IFAHP to evaluate and has established a comprehensive environmental impact assessment model for shale gas development based on IFAHP.

Mengistu, D G and Mahesh, G (2019) Dimensions for improvement of construction management practice in Ethiopian construction industry. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 21–39.

Neshat, N, Hadian, H and Rahimi Alangi, S (2019) Technological learning modelling towards sustainable energy planning. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 84–101.

Othman, A A E and Khalil, M H (2019) Divergent heritage sustainability: a threefold approach through lean talent management. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 150–71.

Patel, T D, Haupt, T C and Bhatt, T (2019) Fuzzy probabilistic approach for risk assessment of BOT toll roads in Indian context. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 251–69.

Soltani, M, Aouag, H and Mouss, M D (2019) An integrated framework using VSM, AHP and TOPSIS for simplifying the sustainability improvement process in a complex manufacturing process. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 211–29.

Syed Abu Bakar, S P, Jaafar, M and Muhibudin, M (2019) Intensifying business success of Malaysian housing development firms through entrepreneurial learning. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 190–210.

Yap, J B H and Toh, H M (2019) Investigating the principal factors impacting knowledge management implementation in construction organisations. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology , 18(01), 55–69.