Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 5 results ...
Bigelow, B F, Saseendran, A and Elliott, J W (2018) Attracting Students to Construction Education Programs: An Exploration of Perceptions by Gender. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 14(03), 179–97.
Hurtado, K C, Smithwick, J B, Pesek, A E and Sullivan, K T (2018) Public School Facility Underfunding: A New Tool to Maximize Construction Dollars and Improve Performance Outcomes. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 14(03), 218–31.
McCoy, A P (2018) Editorial. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 14(03), 161–2.
Sindhu, J, Choi, K, Lavy, S, Rybkowski, Z K, Bigelow, B F and Li, W (2018) Effects of Front-End Planning under Fast-Tracked Project Delivery Systems for Industrial Projects. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 14(03), 163–78.
Umeokafor, N and Windapo, A O (2018) Understanding the Underrepresentation of Qualitative Research Approaches to Built Environment Research in Nigeria. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 14(03), 198–217.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: Built environment; interpretivism; Nigeria; qualitative research; research methodology;
- ISBN/ISSN: 1557-8771
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2017.1316799
- Abstract:
There is evidence that scholars in some countries, including Nigeria, primarily employ the quantitative approach to research, and that in some cases this approach is used inappropriately. This leaves research questions that should be tackled from a qualitative standpoint either unaddressed or incorrectly addressed. The aim of this study is to understand why the qualitative approach (QA) has failed to gain similar recognition in Nigeria and other countries, and by extension, the disposition of researchers towards its use. The impact of the disposition of researchers toward QA was also explored. Researchers in the various built environment (BE) disciplines in Nigeria were interviewed. The results revealed that there is a preference for quantitative research, while QAs are used if convenient. Furthermore, the study revealed that the educational background of academics and their poor understanding of the qualitative paradigm explain their disposition toward the adoption of the QA in research. This finding suggests that academic followers instead of leaders are being produced, and that research is done for ad hominem promotion. In advancing the understanding of QA in BE research in Nigeria, this study also draws the attention of stakeholders in the academia to the implications of a preference by researchers for quantitative research.