Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 24 results ...
Abdel-Wahab, M and Vogl, B (2011) Trends of productivity growth in the construction industry across Europe, US and Japan. Construction Management and Economics, 29(06), 635–44.
Bajjou, M S and Chafi, A (2022) Exploring the critical waste factors affecting construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(06), 2268-99.
Camilleri, M, Jaques, R and Isaacs, N (2001) Impacts of climate change on building performance in New Zealand. Building Research & Information, 29(06), 430–50.
Chi, C S F and Nicole Javernick‐Will, A (2011) Institutional effects on project arrangement: high‐speed rail projects in China and Taiwan. Construction Management and Economics, 29(06), 595–611.
Edwards, D J (2001) Predicting construction plant maintenance expenditure. Building Research & Information, 29(06), 417–27.
Ekanayake, E M A C, Shen, G, Kumaraswamy, M and Owusu, E K (2022) A fuzzy synthetic evaluation of vulnerabilities affecting supply chain resilience of industrialized construction in Hong Kong. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(06), 2358-81.
Gambatese, J A and Hallowell, M (2011) Enabling and measuring innovation in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 29(06), 553–67.
Gidigah, B K, Agyekum, K and Baiden, B K (2022) Defining social value in the public procurement process for works. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(06), 2245-67.
Gundes, S (2011) Input structure of the construction industry: a cross‐country analysis, 1968–90. Construction Management and Economics, 29(06), 613–21.
Hartono, B and Yap, C M (2011) Understanding risky bidding: a prospect‐contingent perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 29(06), 579–93.
Mohamed, E, Jafari, P and Hammad, A (2022) Mixed qualitative–quantitative approach for bidding decisions in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(06), 2328-57.
Murray, B and Smyth, H (2011) Franchising in the US remodelling market: growth opportunities and barriers faced by general contractors. Construction Management and Economics, 29(06), 623–34.
Musarat, M A, Alaloul, W S and Liew, M S (2022) Inflation rate and labours’ wages in construction projects: economic relation investigation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(06), 2461-94.
Navandar, Y V, Bari, C and Gaikwad, P G (2022) Failure factors–a comparative study of private and government construction firms. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(06), 2495-513.
Rezakhani, P (2022) Project scheduling and performance prediction: a fuzzy-Bayesian network approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(06), 2233-44.
Scheublin, F J M (2001) Project alliance contract in The Netherlands. Building Research & Information, 29(06), 451–5.
Shouman, B, Othman, A A E and Marzouk, M (2022) Enhancing users involvement in architectural design using mobile augmented reality. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(06), 2514-34.
Taher, A, Vahdatikhaki, F and Hammad, A (2022) Formalizing knowledge representation in earthwork operations through development of domain ontology. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(06), 2382-414.
van Manen, M, olde Scholtenhuis, L and Voordijk, H (2022) Empirically validating five propositions regarding 3D visualizations for subsurface utility projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(06), 2535-53.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: computer-aided design; subsurface utilities; three-dimensional (3D) visualization; underground construction
- ISBN/ISSN:
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2020-0980
- Abstract:
Purpose: This study aims to empirically validate five propositions about the benefits of three-dimensional (3D) visualizations for the management of subsurface utility projects. Specifically, the authors validate whether benefits from 3D in the literature of building construction project management also apply to subsurface utility projects and map them using a taxonomy of project complexity levels. Design/methodology/approach: A multiple case study of three utility construction projects was carried out during which the first author was involved in the daily work practices at a utility contractor. 3D visualizations of existing project models were developed, and design and construction meetings were conducted. Practitioners’ interactions with and reflections on these 3D visualizations were noted. Observational data from the three project types were matched with the five propositions to determine where benefits of 3D visualizations manifested themselves. Findings: Practitioners found that 3D visualizations had most merit in crowded urban environments when constructing rigid pipelines. All propositions were validated and evaluated as beneficial in subsurface utility projects of complexity level C3. It is shown that in urban projects with rigid pipelines (project with the highest complexity level), 3D visualization prevents misunderstanding or misinterpretations and increases efficiency of coordination. It is recommended to implement 3D visualization approaches in such complex projects Originality/value: There is only limited evidence on the value 3D visualizations in managing utility projects. This study contributes rich empirical evidence on this value based on a six-month observation period at a subsurface contractor. Their merit was assessed by associating 3D approaches with project complexity levels, which may help utility contractors in strategically implementing 3D applications.
Wang, K, Ke, Y, Liu, T and Sankaran, S (2022) Social sustainability in Public–Private Partnership projects: case study of the Northern Beaches Hospital in Sydney. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(06), 2437-60.
Wang, Z, Xie, W and Liu, J (2022) Regional differences and driving factors of construction and demolition waste generation in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(06), 2300-27.
Westberg, K, Noren, J and Kus, H (2001) On using available environmental data in service life estimates. Building Research & Information, 29(06), 428–39.
Yap, J B H, Skitmore, M, Lim, Y W, Loo, S C and Gray, J (2022) Assessing the expected current and future competencies of quantity surveyors in the Malaysian built environment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(06), 2415-36.
Zhang, H, Xing, F and Liu, J (2011) Rehabilitation decision-making for buildings in the Wenchuan area. Construction Management and Economics, 29(06), 569–78.